Keeping librarians weird

This morning’s keynote speaker was the inspirational Joyce Valenza. She began with challenging us to stop saying, “think outside the box” – why have a box at all? She wants to keep school libraries and librarians weird by encouraging us to have continuous transformation as part of our practice. The title of her presentation was ‘The whys and the what if’s: library innovator’s mindset.’

Valenza asserts that in school libraries transformation is a mandate and it is empowering ~ librarians are responsible for creatively move communities forward. Our spaces and programmes must be growing organisms. Choose to look up and look at the sky not the floor of our practice. There is no one right way to do school library so you can do it your way.

Using the Simon Sinek model of starting with the why of what we do Joyce asked us to think about our own WHY. Knowing your why it will make all the difference to your practice. What is your vision? My why is – I want the people in my school community to be the best learners they can be

What is the worst consequence of your best idea? Then take the risk. Taking responsible risks is all part of an innovator’s mindset. F

FAIL = First Attempt At Learning. The most important word in growth mindset and learning is “yet.” Nurture the growth mindset in yourself in others.

Some useful social networking groups to follow include: Twitter hashtag #inTLchat and #inTLlead

Some books to add to my summer reading list: The innovator’s mindset by George Couros; Social Leadia by Jennifer Casa-Todd; Connected Librarians by Nikki D. Robertson; Reimagining Library Spaces by Diana Rendina and School Librarianship, past, present and future edited by Susan Alman

 

An action point in planning for the next academic year is to think of three personas you want to develop in your role at school and focus on those. Stop doing anything that does not directly and positively impact learning.

Thanks, Joyce for the inspiration to keep school libraries weird.

Final reflection ETL 505

Access – it’s all about access. The purpose of resource description is to provide users with access to the information that a resource contains (Hider, 2013, p.3).  This is the reason we classify resources in our school libraries now and will continue to do so in the future.

These days our students can access a flood of information on almost any subject through a keyword search on Google. This fast and easy keyword searching is often used in the library catalogue as well but it provides a lot of irrelevant information (Scribner Library, 2015). Classification and resource description provide subject headings. Using a subject search within a catalogue or a database, the student will find fewer resources but those resources will be relevant to the topic of their research (Scribner Library, 2015). The subject search approach is something our students need to learn and utilise in order to discover useful and relevant information.

 Some school libraries have decided to adopt genre and subject headings as a way to organise their resources rather than using Dewey. An example of this can be found in St. Vrain Valley School District, Colorado (Buchter, 2013, p.49). While the library does not use Dewey the librarians have devised a subject heading list that they use to classify their resources so their students can find them. The subject classification utilises assigned, controlled headings (Buchter, 2013, p.51). As other schools discuss this method of resource organisation for their libraries it is important that Teacher Librarians (TLs) understand the implications of such a change in terms of access to resources and information for the students.

It is essential to be accurate in describing resources. Unfortunately in this digital age where catalogue records are easy to download, the skills of cataloguing are often undervalued. Yet a mistake in a record can mean the record and, therefore, the resource becomes irretrievable (Attar, 2006, p.174).  It is clear that, at the very least, a basic understanding of cataloguing is needed by all librarians including TLs. Cataloguing is anything but intuitive, and no matter how intelligent the person cataloguing is, unless they have an understanding of subject headings, classification, the need for correct spelling, word order and punctuation, they will unwittingly deny access to that resource (Attar, 2006, p. 184).  While it is easy to import existing records into school library catalogues, it is still the responsibility of TLs to know their students and to apply location classifications and additional subject headings or notes which will provide access to resources.

Digitisation allows library catalogues to develop and offer federated searches. The students can search physical library resources and the databases on offer in one search. To achieve this level of interoperability the systems will need to “talk to each other” which in turn requires a level of standardisation between them (Hider, 2013, p, 47). The ease of internet searching means that students now expect a “one-stop” approach in their library catalogue. If cataloguers can continue to devise ways to meet user expectations of seamless searches then the future for cataloguing appears to be bright indeed (Hider, 2006, p.164). A large part of the contribution cataloguers can bring to the evolving information age is the methodology of describing resources in such a manner that enables quality information to be accessed.

 

References

Attar, K. E. (2006). Why appoint professionals? A student cataloguing project. Journal of librarianship and information science, 38(3), 173-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0961000606066578

Buchter, H. (2013). Dewey vs genre throwdown. Knowledge Quest, 42(2), 48-55. Retrieved from EBSCOhost database. (Accession No. 91761325)

Hider, P. (2007). Information access. In S. Ferguson (Author), Libraries in the twenty-first century: Charting new directions in information services (pp. 145-164) [PDF]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-876938-43-7.50019-3

Hider, P. (2013). Information resource description: Creating and managing metadata (U.S. ed.). Chicago, Ill.: ALA editions.

Scribner Library. (2015, August 24). Keywords and subject terms [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aTQbacIha2Q

 

 

Arrangement of print collections and existence of libraries

I was privileged to attend a one day workshop with Kevin Hennah last year. He was looking at library design – the most important part of his session was about the promotion of the print collection in our school libraries. Kevin’s background is retail marketing, in particular display and promotions. He maintains that our customers are our students and teachers and they need to be connected with the product – our library resources. The physical collection – mostly print needs to be seen. He maintains that shelves and shelves of book spines are not very appealing to the customer. He strongly suggests ensuring that the library has as much face out shelving as possible. As far as arrangement is concerned it is up to the librarian to know the needs of the customer. Each library will be different with differing emphasis and customer needs. The one thing that all libraries have that is the same is the high impact areas in terms of the layout of the library. Obviously the entrance to the library and the first things the customer sees are what will make the most impact. Kevin suggests having the best books, new books and hot topic books at these high use areas. No need for fancy displays with lots of writing let the covers speak for themselves.

 I returned to my library after the conference and took lots of photos. I walked in as if I was new to the library, as if I was a customer and realized that as people walked in our doors what did they see? Shelves of books spines. I have worked over a few months to change the way we display our books – now as people walk in they see the same shelving units but instead of hundreds of books on it they see 9 – 12 books on display face out. The current display is books by the two authors coming to our school this month and in March. I put the display up yesterday and already I need to find more books to add to it. The display didn’t even have a sign – just the books. We are making do with shelving and furniture but I hope next year to purchase more display units and stands.

 I think arrangement of the collection should be as flexible as possible. At the moment we have the fiction collection divided into Picture books, I can read books, Primary years books, Young Adult and Adult as well as International Languages. Believe it or not this is a reduction on the number of collection in play when I arrived at the school. I think it is too many but with students from age 3 through to age 18 our entire collection has to cater for a wide range of needs. I hope to create more flexibility with the collection through adding mobile shelving and having shelving that can help create reading areas and collaborative spaces.

 I agree with the Winston Churchill quote Parkes uses “We shape our buildings; thereafter they shape us.” Having attended the Kevin Hennah workshop I see the need for more flexibility in our library spaces as we serve school communities with changing and evolving needs. Our collections need to serve those needs and so does our library space.

So if libraries didn’t exist would we build them today?

The key thing about a library for me is all about SHARING. It is about sharing resources, sharing ideas and sharing space. I work in a school that has the word “community” in its name. This sharing environment is all about what fosters community and community fosters sharing – it is a lovely two way street. Even on social media we see people ‘sharing’ links, retweeting information. A few years ago an electronic library came into existence in Bulgaria. People were invited to upload work to it so others could read it. Two major things happened as a result – 1. people visited libraries or purchased the titles that people were uploading because they preferred to read the hard copies and 2. the Government shut the site down proclaiming it was a danger to the public (Masnick, 2010).

I think libraries would exist today – they seem to spring up in so many places without any organisational support. After the Christchurch earthquake in February 2011, old fridges with glass doors were used a local community lending libraries – created by the people in the community who wanted to share their books with each other (Nolan, 2013). These people did not have access to thier badly damaged public libraries so they created their own local versions. I think when you delve into the history of libraries you see that many modern libraries began with wealthy people donating their massive private collection to the community. Libraries are about community and sharing – they are bigger than the building, the staff and the collection.

 

Hennah, K. (2014, September). Rethink. Reinvent. Rejuvenate. Workshop presented at the seventh triennial ECIS librarians’ conference.,     Waterloo, Belgium.

Masnick, M. (2010, June 30). If the public library was invented today, would the Gov’t call it organized crime and shut it down? Retrieved January 10, 2015, from https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100630/12152310025.shtml 

Nolan, S. (2013, April 10). Out of the rubble: Christchurch still bears the 
     scars of earthquake devastation but is finding creative ways to get back on 
     its feet. Daily Mail. Retrieved from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ 
     article-2307011/ Out-rubble-Christchurch-bears-scars-earthquake-devastation-finding-creative-ways- feet.html
Parkes, D. (2010). Transforming the library – e-books and e-buildings. In D.Parkes & G. Walton (Eds.), Web 2.0 and libraries : impacts,technologies and trends (pp. 13-29). Oxford : Chandos.

Why read? Change the world and change yourself

The phrase 21st century literacies still has momentum even though we are 15 years into the new century and there are diverse opinions as to what should be included as one of these literacies.. One example of this discussion comes from the USA where teachers and teacher librarians (TL) are working with multiple literacies – visual, digital, textual and technological (SLMS Role in Reading Task Force, 2009), and having to implement them from curriculum documents into their classrooms. With the expanding demands on time teachers and TLs are using flipped classroom techniques to cover all the learning content their students need. The question “why read?”does seem to be valid.

One reason for students to read is that it can change the world or at the very least their standing in the world. The Organisation for Economic and Co-operation and Development (OECD) has as its mission statement “to promote policies that will improve the economic and social well-being of people around the world”, (“The Organisation for Economic,” n.d.). The OECD is not a group of educators but it is revealing that one of the activities this organisation undertakes is a regular assessment of educational growth in countries. Even more so one of its reports states  “Reading skills are more important than ever for economic and social interaction in the modern world”.  (“OECD Reports Emphasise Reading,” 2002). The report also recognizes the importance of reading proficiency for employment “despite the development of other new forms of oral and visual communication”  (“OECD Reports Emphasise Reading,” 2002). In the research conducted on behalf of the OECD students age 15 years from participating countries are tested in reading and also surveyed about their social-economic backgrounds and whether they read in their own time. Obviously the degree to which teenagers are engaged in reading varies from country to country but the OECD research found that students from disadvantaged backgrounds who read a lot get higher reading scores that those from more fortunate backgrounds but who do not read. Their conclusion was that “finding ways to engage students in reading may be one of the most effective ways to leverage social change,” (“OECD Reports Emphasise Reading,” 2002).

 Another reason for students to read is that is enables the reader to grow as a person. Through reading students gain enjoyment, develop imagination and gain inspiration. They can experience emotions, circumstances and events vicariously, they develop empathy though identifying with characters, (Lynch-Brown, Tomlinson, & Tomlinson, 2005, p.4). They can connect with their own heritage and gain an understanding of the cultures and values of others. They can develop moral reasoning. As they read they develop personal preferences and tastes in literature. In fact as the student develops as a reader they become more motivated by self selection of materials and critical of the literature they read.  (Lynch-Brown, Tomlinson, & Tomlinson, 2005, p.5). All of these attributes are qualities and strengths educators and parents would want for their students.

So with the OECD’s call to find ways to engage readers and Tomlinson’s description of the personal benefits of reading why is it that students do not read? Kelly Gallagher, author of the book Readicide: How schools are killing reading and what you can do about it, states that students lose interest in reading at school because they are forced to “jump through hoops” once they have read the books they have been assigned, (White, 2009). Stephen Krashen asserts that the only way students can become good readers is to let them read (Krashen, 2004. p. 37). He states teachers should allow the students to select what they want to read without giving them assigned work once they have read it,. He calls this Free Voluntary Reading (FVR) and research has shown that FVR reading leads to better reading comprehension, writing style, spelling and grammatical development and FVR in school leads to students reading for pleasure outside of school time (Krashen, 2004. p17).

One of the best resources to encouraging students to read is a library. Research findings in the UK have seen that, “non-library users were found to be more than three times more likely to only read when in class, and more than three times more likely to state that they cannot find anything to read that interests them, and almost three times as likely to rate themselves as not very good readers compared to library users,” (Education standards research team, 2012, p.27). In fact “the research found a link between library use and reading for pleasure; young people that use their public library are nearly twice as likely to be reading outside of class every day,” (Education standards research team, 2012, p.27). Students with access to school libraries do more reading than students who had access to a book collection without a librarian (Krashen, 2004. P 59).

 So why read? To change the world, to change yourself and because it can be fun.

 

References

Education standards research team. (2012, May). Research evidence on reading for pleasure. London: Department for Education.

 

Gallagher, K., & Allington, R. L. (2009). Readicide: How schools are killing reading and what you can do about it. Portland, Me.: Stenhouse.

 

Krashen, S. D. (2004). The power of reading: Insights from the research (2nd ed.). Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited.

 

Lynch-Brown, C., Tomlinson, C. M., & Tomlinson, C. M. (2005). Essentials of children’s literature (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

 

OECD Reports Emphasise Reading Skills, Teacher Supply as Keys to Educational Success. (2002, November 13). Retrieved November 22, 2014, from http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/oecdreportsemphasisereadingskillsteachersupplyaskeystoeducationalsuccess.htm

 

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (n.d.). Retrieved November 22, 2014, from http://www.oecd.org/about/

 

SLMS Role in Reading Task Force. (2009, July). What Every SLMS Should Know about Teaching Multiple Literacies Strategies [Microsoft powerpoint]. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CC8QFjAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ala.org%2Faasl%2Fsites%2Fala.org.aasl%2Ffiles%2Fcontent%2Faaslissues%2Ftoolkits%2Fslroleinreading%2Frrtfmultipleliteracies.ppt&ei=lppwVOmBGIrjywOxuYGgCg&usg=AFQjCNFoozLpK9k3PxGpEnQnqLXNybS-4g&sig2=7fyuT5QinOroMYwNAPAW-w&bvm=bv.80185997,d.ZWU

White, A. (2009, July 1). Kelly Gallagher Readicide Part 2 [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJ6t09DxXO4